Divided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize property
Time:2024-05-22 11:15:46 Source:politicsViews(143)
WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.
Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.
Previous:Singapore Airlines: 1 dead, others injured after London
Next:Australia's deputy prime minister pledges support to Solomon Islands during visit to Honiara
You may also like
- The Los Angeles Rams will hold their training camp at Loyola Marymount University this summer
- Don Donoher, the winningest basketball coach at Dayton, dies at 92
- Boston Red Sox shortstop Trevor Story has season
- Biden could miss the deadline for the November ballot in Alabama
- Rajasthan Royals launch ANOTHER bid to invest in cash
- Boston Red Sox shortstop Trevor Story has season
- Washington man pleads guilty to groping woman on San Diego to Seattle flight
- The Titans trade a seventh
- Stanford, UCLA to meet for NCAA title in women's golf